Wooley
(1985) indicated that architects are vital players in the planning arena
because they can use figures, drawings and other visual aids as a
means of thinking through seeing. In the same manner, the urban design
planners are the ones who can effectively connect the concept of beauty
(aesthetic) with usefulness (practicality), and structural integrity
(engineering) with other positive
attributes essential to a satisfactory physical environment e.g.
robustness, permeability, etc. (responsiveness). These are
interlinked concepts, and the achievement of a good balance of
these concepts is vital to the success of the
urban development plans.
According
to Bentley, et.al. (1985), structures
and spaces should offer its users a wide array of choices in order
to maximise their benefits. The built environment should provide
its users with an essentially democratic
setting. Again, among all those involved, it is the
urban design planner who is the most capable one in ensuring this
aspect given his background discipline.
A
good urban design planner does not strictly need
well-honed skills in design analysis. But he/she certainly has to know
what to look for and what questions to ask. He/she
always must recognise that there are limits
to his/her own experience and outlook and therefore,
working with others
and consultations with those whom the urban design and
plans are intended for will always have
better results in terms of responsiveness.
Working with other players too is important. Moreover, they
must go out and be in touch with the reality that is happening outside of
their office. What is learned in the four corners of the classroom should
be supplemented with hands-on experience in
the field. That "experience is the best teacher", is true.
No comments:
Post a Comment